|
Miltenyi Biotec
cd3 Cd3, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+cd3/CD3+Antibody%2C+anti-mouse%2C+REAfinity/pm42437405-77-5-7 Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cd3 - by Bioz Stars,
2026-09
95/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Bio X Cell
anti cd3 cd28 antibodies Anti Cd3 Cd28 Antibodies, supplied by Bio X Cell, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+cd3/InVivoMAb+anti-mouse+CD28/pmc12963920-413-4-12 Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti cd3 cd28 antibodies - by Bioz Stars,
2026-09
97/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Miltenyi Biotec
mouse anti human cd3 monoclonal antibody ![]() Mouse Anti Human Cd3 Monoclonal Antibody, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+cd3/CD3+Antibody%2C+anti-human/pmc13292952-190-48-55 Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mouse anti human cd3 monoclonal antibody - by Bioz Stars,
2026-09
96/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Miltenyi Biotec
cd3 antibody ![]() Cd3 Antibody, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+cd3/CD3%CE%B5+Antibody%2C+anti-mouse%2C+REAfinity/pmc13129426-7-0-9 Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cd3 antibody - by Bioz Stars,
2026-09
99/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Miltenyi Biotec
rea606 ![]() Rea606, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+cd3/CD3+Antibody%2C+anti-mouse%2C+REAfinity/pmc13129426-7-5-9 Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rea606 - by Bioz Stars,
2026-09
95/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Elabscience Biotechnology
fitc anti mouse cd3 ![]() Fitc Anti Mouse Cd3, supplied by Elabscience Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+cd3/FITC+Anti-Mouse+CD3+Antibody/pmc13091351-201-16-35 Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
fitc anti mouse cd3 - by Bioz Stars,
2026-09
95/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Miltenyi Biotec
cd3 percp ![]() Cd3 Percp, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+cd3/CD3+Antibody%2C+anti-mouse%2C+REAfinity/pm42307014-224-23-24 Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cd3 percp - by Bioz Stars,
2026-09
95/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Miltenyi Biotec
cd3 microbeads ![]() Cd3 Microbeads, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+cd3/CD3%CE%B5+Antibody%2C+anti-mouse%2C+REAfinity/pmc13139981-219-23-25 Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cd3 microbeads - by Bioz Stars,
2026-09
99/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Miltenyi Biotec
human cd3 microbeads ![]() Human Cd3 Microbeads, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+cd3/Pan+T+Cell+Isolation+Kit+II%2C+mouse/pmc13265216-130-14-17 Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
human cd3 microbeads - by Bioz Stars,
2026-09
97/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Miltenyi Biotec
cd3 antibody, anti-human ![]() Cd3 Antibody, Anti Human, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+cd3/CD3+Antibody%2C+anti-human/custom%40130-093-377%4042167233 Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cd3 antibody, anti-human - by Bioz Stars,
2026-09
96/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
Journal: Science Advances
Article Title: Harnessing skin-resident γδ T cells for immunotherapy in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma
doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aec7215
Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) Expression of indicated chemokine receptors by in vitro expanded, live gated CD3 + Vδ1 + γδ T cells. Blood-derived αβ T cells were used as staining control. ( B ) As (A), graphical summary of the percentage of Vδ1 + γδ T cell expressing the chemokine receptors ( n = 5 skin donors). Error bars represent mean ± SD. ( C ) 10 × 10 6 human skin–derived T cells, containing approximately 7% of Vδ1 + γδ T cells, were injected intravenously (i.v.) into NSG mice carrying a xSCC of a volume ranging from 100 to 200 mm 3 [reached approximately 60 to 80 days (d) post–i.d. injection of SCC-13 cells]. Each mouse was injected intraperitoneally (i.p.) with recombinant IL-2 and IL-15 daily until the harvest day. Figure created in BioRender. I. Gratz (2026) https://BioRender.com/zmnd28b . ( D ) Representative plot of the percentage of Vδ1 + γδ T cells engrafted in the spleen, blood, xSCC and murine skin 2, 7, or 14 days posttransfer. ( E to G ) Bar graphs show the absolute numbers of ingoing Vδ1 + γδ T cells, Vδ1 + γδ T cells engrafting spleen and blood normalized to mouse weight (grams), and xSCC and murine skin normalized to tissue weight (grams). (E) n = 7 mice per group; pool of two independent experiments. (F) n = 12 mice per group; pool of four independent experiments; (G) n = 12 mice per group; pool of two independent experiments. Each symbol represents one skin donor. Error bars represent mean ± SD. Statistical significance was determined using the Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple comparisons test. All data points, including extreme values, are shown. ( H ) Representative immunofluorescent staining of colocalized TCRδ/DAPI in HD skin and xSCC 7 days after γδ transfer. Scale bars, 100 μm. Staining controls are shown in fig. S4.
Article Snippet: Human skin–derived T lymphocytes were labeled with Cell Proliferation Dye eFluor 450 (10 μM, Thermo Fisher Scientific, catalog no. 65- 0842-85), washed with PBS, and subsequently stimulated for 6 days with rhuIL-2 (100 IU/ml; BioLegend, catalog no. 589108), rhuIL-15 (20 ng/ml; BioLegend, catalog no. 570603), in addition with
Techniques: Expressing, In Vitro, Derivative Assay, Staining, Control, Injection, Recombinant
Journal: Science Advances
Article Title: Harnessing skin-resident γδ T cells for immunotherapy in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma
doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aec7215
Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) Levels of cytokines (pg/mg tissue) produced by HD skin, huSCC, ES, and xSCC. Heatmap bars represent the mean of n = 5 HD skin and huSCC donors, and mean n = 5 of xenograft mice. ( B ) Representative gating strategy and bar graphs of the human skin–derived and ex vivo expanded Vδ1 + γδ T cells expressing IL-1RAcP and IL-18Rα. Peripheral blood αβ T cells and ex vivo expanded skin-derived αβ T cells were used as staining controls. Mean of n = 5 skin donors. ( C ) eFluor450-labeled γδ T cells were cultured under basal conditions [unstimulated or with IL-2 (100 IU/ml) and IL-15 (20 ng/ml)] or stimulated with anti-CD3 (1 μg/ml) and/or IL-1α and IL-18 (9 ng/ml) for 6 days. Proliferation was assessed by the median fluorescence intensity (MFI) of eFluor450 in Vδ1 + by flow cytometry. The representative histograms show the eFluor450 dilution in Vδ1 + T cells in the different conditions. Cell counts were normalized to unit area. ( D ) Bar graphs show the fold change of efluor450 MFI of Vδ1 + treated with anti-CD3, IL-1α, and IL-18 relative to IL-2 and IL-15. Mean of n = 6 skin donors. Statistical analysis was performed using a Friedman test followed by Dunn’s multiple comparisons test. Data in bar graphs (B) and (D) are shown as mean ± SD.
Article Snippet: Human skin–derived T lymphocytes were labeled with Cell Proliferation Dye eFluor 450 (10 μM, Thermo Fisher Scientific, catalog no. 65- 0842-85), washed with PBS, and subsequently stimulated for 6 days with rhuIL-2 (100 IU/ml; BioLegend, catalog no. 589108), rhuIL-15 (20 ng/ml; BioLegend, catalog no. 570603), in addition with
Techniques: Produced, Derivative Assay, Ex Vivo, Expressing, Staining, Labeling, Cell Culture, Fluorescence, Flow Cytometry
Journal: Molecular Therapy Oncology
Article Title: Engineered Salmonella -mediated c-di-AMP delivery activates STING to remodel the tumor microenvironment
doi: 10.1016/j.omton.2026.201185
Figure Lengend Snippet: Effect of SL disA therapy on T cells and macrophage from tumor samples (A, B) Flow Cytometry analysis of CD3 and CD8 surface markers(A) and CD3 + CD8 + cells statistical graph (B). (C, D) Flow cytometry analysis of CD3 and CD4 surface markers (C) and CD3 + CD4 + cells statistical graph (D). (E, F) Flow cytometry analysis of F4/80 and CD86 surface markers (E) and F4/80 + CD86 + cells statistical graph (F). Data are expressed as mean ± SEM, n = 3. ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001, one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons tests.
Article Snippet: The following antibodies were used: FITC anti-mouse F4/80 (clone CI: A3-1), APC anti-mouse CD86 (clone GL-1),
Techniques: Flow Cytometry
Journal: Molecular Therapy. Nucleic Acids
Article Title: Lipid nanoparticle mRNA delivery preserves CAR T cell cytotoxicity and limits exhaustion compared to electroporation
doi: 10.1016/j.omtn.2026.102929
Figure Lengend Snippet: Transfection efficacy of CD19-CAR mRNA and co-expression of multiple IVT mRNAs in polyclonally activated T cells (A) Experimental workflow: PBMCs from healthy donors were isolated, CD3 + T cells enriched by MACS, polyclonally activated with plate-bound anti-CD3/CD28 antibodies for 48 h, and electroporated with IVT mRNA on day 3. Created with BioRender.com . (B and C) Flow cytometric analysis of CD19-CAR + frequency (B) and CD19-CAR molecules per cell (C) in CD3 + , CD4 + , and CD8 + T cell subsets at 8 h and 24 h post-electroporation. (D) Schematic of single and co-transfection approach using CD19-CAR ± CCR7 mRNA. Created with BioRender.com . (E) Representative plots of mock-transfected control, CD19-CAR-only, CCR7-only, and CD19-CAR + CCR7 co-transfected T cells, showing CD19-CAR and CCR7 expression 8 h post-transfection. (F) Viability of T cells following single and dual mRNA transfection, assessed by live/dead staining 8 h post-transfection. (G–I) Quantification of CD19-CAR-only versus CD19-CAR + CCR7 co-expression: CD19-CAR + frequency (G), CD19-CAR geometric mean fluorescence intensity (H), and CCR7 geometric mean fluorescence intensity (I) in CD3 + T cells, 8 h after mRNA transfection ( n = 8 donors). (J) Schematic of multiplexing approach using four IVT mRNAs (CD19-CAR, CCR7, CXCR3, and GFP). Created with BioRender.com . (K–N) Flow cytometric analysis of four-mRNA multiplexing showing frequency of CD19-CAR + GFP + double-positive cells (K and L) and geometric mean fluorescence intensity of CXCR3 (M) and CCR7 (N), 8 h post-transfection ( n = 3 donors). Statistical analysis between subpopulations was performed by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test or paired t test. ns, not significant; ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001. Data represent mean ± SD from the indicated number of independent donors.
Article Snippet: PBMCs were isolated from healthy donors using Biocoll (Biochrom) gradient centrifugation, and CD3 + T cells were enriched using magnetic cell separation with
Techniques: Transfection, Expressing, Isolation, Electroporation, Cotransfection, Control, Staining, Fluorescence, Multiplexing
Journal: Molecular Therapy. Nucleic Acids
Article Title: Lipid nanoparticle mRNA delivery preserves CAR T cell cytotoxicity and limits exhaustion compared to electroporation
doi: 10.1016/j.omtn.2026.102929
Figure Lengend Snippet: Memory phenotype characterization of IVT mRNA-transfected CD19-CAR T cells (A) Representative flow cytometry plots showing the gating strategy for CD8 + memory T cell subsets in primary human CD3 + -enriched T cells. Subsets were defined by CD3 + , CD4 – , CD8 + , and CCR7/CD45RA expression as follows: naive like (T naive like ; CCR7 + CD45RA + ), central memory (T CM ; CCR7 + CD45RA – ), effector memory (T EM ; CCR7 – CD45RA – ), and terminally differentiated effector (T EMRA ; CCR7 – CD45RA + ). (B) Frequencies of CD4 + and CD8 + T cells within CD19-CAR + populations compared with mock-transfected controls after electroporation or LNP transfection. (C and D) Geometric mean fluorescence intensity (gMFI) of CD19-CAR expression in bulk CD4 + (C) and CD8 + (D) T cell populations following electroporation or LNP-mediated transfection; representative experiment. (E and F) CD19-CAR surface expression across memory T cell subsets within the CD8 + population following electroporation (E) or LNP-mediated (F) mRNA delivery over 108 h post-transfection. Statistical analysis was performed by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test (B) or by two-way repeated-measures ANOVA with Šidák’s multiple-comparison test (E and F). ns, not significant; ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001. Data represent mean ± SD from n = 4 independent donors, unless stated otherwise.
Article Snippet: PBMCs were isolated from healthy donors using Biocoll (Biochrom) gradient centrifugation, and CD3 + T cells were enriched using magnetic cell separation with
Techniques: Transfection, Flow Cytometry, Expressing, Electroporation, Fluorescence, Comparison
Journal: Molecular Therapy. Nucleic Acids
Article Title: Lipid nanoparticle mRNA delivery preserves CAR T cell cytotoxicity and limits exhaustion compared to electroporation
doi: 10.1016/j.omtn.2026.102929
Figure Lengend Snippet: Functional characterization of CD19-CAR mRNA transfected T cells following antigen encounter (A) Experimental workflow of the overnight stimulation assay: mock-transfected and mRNA-transfected CD19-CAR T cells were stimulated with NALM6 (CD19 + ) cells for 16 h in the presence of brefeldin A to capture intracellular cytokine production by flow cytometry. Created with BioRender.com . (B) Representative flow cytometry plots showing activation marker expression (CD137 and CD154) in CD3 + T cells with (stimulated) and without (unstimulated) target cell stimulation. Comparisons are shown for electroporated (left) and LNP-transfected (right) CD19-CAR T cells. (C) Frequencies of activated (CD137 + and/or CD154 + ) CD3 + , CD4 + , and CD8 + T cell populations, comparing electroporation and LNP delivery methods. Data are background-subtracted. (D) Intracellular effector cytokine production (IFN-γ and TNF-α) within activated CD3 + , CD4 + , and CD8 + T cell populations. Data showing the relative increase in cytokine-producing T cells for LNP transfection normalized to electroporation. Statistical analysis was performed by paired t test. ns, not significant; ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001. Data represent mean ± SD from n = 4 independent donors.
Article Snippet: PBMCs were isolated from healthy donors using Biocoll (Biochrom) gradient centrifugation, and CD3 + T cells were enriched using magnetic cell separation with
Techniques: Functional Assay, Transfection, Flow Cytometry, Activation Assay, Marker, Expressing, Cell Stimulation, Electroporation
Journal: Molecular Therapy. Nucleic Acids
Article Title: Lipid nanoparticle mRNA delivery preserves CAR T cell cytotoxicity and limits exhaustion compared to electroporation
doi: 10.1016/j.omtn.2026.102929
Figure Lengend Snippet: Functional characterization of CD19-CAR T cells produced by LNP-mediated versus electroporation-based mRNA delivery (A) Experimental workflow: electroporated and LNP-transfected T cells were assessed in an in vitro transwell assay, first migrating toward CCL21 for 3 h, followed by co-culture with NALM6 target cells (CD19 + GFP + ). Killing efficiency was monitored over 28 h with 4-h intervals using live-cell imaging. Created with BioRender.com . (B) Killing efficacy of NALM6 (CD19 + GFP + ) target cells using untouched, mock-transfected and CD19-CAR mRNA transfected T cells (EP and LNP) over 28 h assessed using live-cell imaging every 4 h. (C) Area under the curve (AUC) analysis of total killing capacity over the 28-h observation period for the same groups relative to untouched T cells. (D) Fold increase of migrated CD3 + T cells toward CCL21 chemokine normalized to untouched T cells comparing LNP and electroporation delivery methods for mock-transfected and CD19-CAR mRNA transfected T cells analyzed using flow cytometry. (E) Flow cytometric analysis of exhaustion marker expression (TIM-3 and LAG-3) in CD3 + , CD4 + and CD8 + T cell populations following cytotoxic activity of LNP-transfected T cells normalized to electroporated T cells. (F) Mean percentage of CAR T cells expressing zero, one, two, or three exhaustion markers in electroporated T cells (upper) and LNP-transfected CD19-CAR T cells (lower) following cytotoxic activity. (G) Supernatants from migrated T cell killing assays were collected and analyzed for pro-inflammatory cytokines. Mean levels of granzyme B, IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-8, and IL-10 are shown. Normalized to CD19-CAR frequency for each sample. Statistical analysis for differences between subpopulations was performed by Friedman test followed by Dunn’s multiple comparison test (C, D, and G) or paired t test (E). ∗ns, not significant; ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001. Data represent mean ± SEM from n = 4 independent donors.
Article Snippet: PBMCs were isolated from healthy donors using Biocoll (Biochrom) gradient centrifugation, and CD3 + T cells were enriched using magnetic cell separation with
Techniques: Functional Assay, Produced, Electroporation, Transfection, In Vitro, Transwell Assay, Co-Culture Assay, Live Cell Imaging, Flow Cytometry, Marker, Expressing, Activity Assay, Comparison